The United Nations Seeks ‘Global Governance’ and Must Be Stopped

“Global governance may sound lofty or abstract; it is not,” said UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, presenting his report to the UN General Assembly on 10 September 2021.

Major global shocks in recent years – including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ukraine war, and the triple planetary crisis, among others – have challenged our international institutions. Unity around our shared principles and common goals is both crucial and urgent.² [Emphasis added.]

In conclusion, the report recommends that Member States consider several elements for inclusion in the Pact for the Future. These include recognizing that “a strengthened international response to complex global shocks must be flexible” and deciding that “the Secretary-General has a standing authority to automatically convene and operationalize an Emergency Platform” should a significant global shock occur. Agreeing that “once activated, an Emergency Platform should be convened for a finite period” and that the Secretary-General may extend it “for such time as necessary” is also among the recommended elements.⁴

Some of the kinds of global shocks that we may encounter in the future include:

a) Large-scale climatic or environmental events that cause major socioeconomic disruptions and/or environmental degradation;

b) Future pandemics with cascading secondary impacts;

c) High-impact events involving a biological agent (deliberate or accidental);

d) Events leading to disruptions to global flows of goods, people, or finance;

e) Large-scale destructive and/or disruptive activity in cyberspace or disruptions to global digital connectivity;

f) A major event in outer space that causes severe disruptions to one or several critical systems on Earth.

g) Unforeseen risks (“black swan” events).⁵

However, the document states that crises without “global consequences” would “not necessarily” be categorized as an emergency requiring U.N. intervention. In other words, some crises that don’t have global consequences might trigger a U.N. response.

The Emergency Platform would not be a standing body or entity but a set of protocols that could be activated when needed. … Once activated, it would bring together leaders from Member States, the United Nations system, key country groupings, international financial institutions, regional bodies, civil society, the private sector, subject-specific industries or research bodies, and other experts.” … I stated, “The platform would not be a new permanent or standing body or institution. It would be triggered automatically in crises of sufficient scale and magnitude, regardless of the type or nature of the crisis involved. Once activated, it would bring together leaders from Member States, the United Nations system, key country groupings, international financial institutions, regional bodies, civil society, the private sector, subject-specific industries or research bodies, and other experts.” This proposal would allow the convening role of the United Nations to be maximized in the face of crises with global reach and should be “agnostic as to the type of crisis,” as we do not know what type of global shock we may face in the future, although the probability of their occurrence is growing.

International cooperation is needed more than ever, yet our collective problem-solving mechanisms do not match the pace or scale of the challenges we face. Today’s complex, interconnected, and rapidly changing world requires a more effective multilateral system – with the United Nations at its core. [Emphasis added.]

We also appreciate the Secretary-General’s out-of-the-box thinking about how to institutionalize these efforts, including a focus on future generations, the emergency platform, the digital compact, elevation of gender equality and human rights; improved UN governance; enhanced efforts to fight climate change; and a greater focus on anti-corruption efforts, among other issues.¹⁰

Other critics who spoke with The Epoch Times expressed concern about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) within the U.N., the global organization’s well-documented corruption problems, and its track record of dealing with previous emergencies.

The powerful influence of the CCP and its mostly “authoritarian” and “crony democracy” allies over the U.N. system represents a major danger when it comes to proposals to grant the global outfit more power, Moley said.

“As long as the controlling interests of the U.N. are in the hands of the CCP and aided and abetted by the G77 [an alliance of 134 governments including the CCP], this cannot be allowed,” he said.

As a result of the CCP’s well-documented control over key U.N. agencies and even its powerful influence over most member states, approving the emergency protocol plan would be tantamount to putting the communist regime in charge of global crises, according to Moley.

Considering that the CCP is a “criminal conspiracy” more than a government and the fact that its agents now dominate vast swaths of the U.N., this is a “recipe for disaster,” he said.

If the emergency platform is approved, the United States as we know it could cease to exist. That sounds dire, but it’s true. We either stand for freedom now or risk everything come September 2024.

Albeit concerned, Gates says he’s optimistic about the World Health Organization’s announcement of a Global Health Emergency Corps that could “spring into action at a moment’s notice when danger emerges.” He sees the success of this team as constantly practicing drills for different potential emerging pathogens, being able to implement widespread global testing, preventative sewage testing, and seamless coordination with governments across the world, he writes. 

And back in 2018, Billionaire Bill Gates gave a warning that the world wasn’t prepared for pandemics, which should “concern us all.”

Speaking at an event hosted by the Massachusetts Medical Society and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on April 27, 2018, Gates said he believed “the world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war.”

“This preparation includes staging simulations, war games, and preparedness exercises so that we can better understand how diseases will spread and how to deal with responses such as quarantine and communications to minimize panic,” Gates said.¹³

WHO ARE THE “THEY” - THESE GLOBAL PREDATORS?

WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVES AND THEIR PLANS FOR US?

HOW CAN WE DEFEND AGAINST THEM?

Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey